| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 41 post(s) |
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
1451
   |
Posted - 2014.10.02 17:59:00 -
[1] - Quote
Kat Ayclism wrote:
This *IS* a problem. You need to have conflict drivers beyond just "eh... let's go **** with these dudes." It's really not giving much confidence in the things to come after this if that is the type of response you have. Right now, and apparently in the future judging by that response there is little reason to go fight over some place.
You have the stick. You're brandishing the stick wildly. Now listen to your players and at least show some regard for the need of a carrot.
This. So much this.
Core to null sov v2.0 must be to tie ISK generation directly into continued alliance-level conflict. I proposed one way to do this (home systems & ISK buffs based on systems held), but thats not the only way...
As long as CCP gets that one thing right, tying ISK generation into alliance level conflict, they will REALLY have something here.
F
Would you like to know more? |
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
1451
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 18:55:00 -
[2] - Quote
Yi Hyori wrote:
Deep null is going to be severely unattractive if these changes go in. There will be no benefit to living on the fringes of null due to logistics difficulties and being cut off from just about everyone. Some may enjoy the challenge and welcome the challenge of being in the frontier, but the income from deep null does not compare significantly enough to hisec to warrant living deep in null, cut off from hisec supply other than to simply claim that I CAN DO IT. This ties in with the mining income, but it also has to do with the ratting as well...
What if these jump changes are the first step in several, including tying ISK generation into system ownership?
I can totally see a smaller alliance going out to a fringe system, declaring it as home, and starting war on neighbors if it buffs their ISK generation. I can also see said home systems being the only systems to allow building of 'super gates', to lands of ISK milk and honey perhaps.... Or imagine said smaller alliance nibbling on the edges of neighboring large alliance systems because that large bloc has overreached its ability to defend all its borders without ridiculous power projection...
If the next moves on this chess board are along those lines, CCP could really have something here.
F
Would you like to know more? |
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
1459
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 19:50:00 -
[3] - Quote
Dammit. I wanted to be page 300..
::sadpanda::
Would you like to know more? |
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
1460
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 20:04:00 -
[4] - Quote
Kun'ii Zenya wrote:
...
As for breaking things up in Null, this is not going to do it.
Normally I am the last person to beg patience with CCP, etc. But, weren't they very clear this is just an opening move in a chess game to that end?
Step 1: Reduce power projection (The stick)
Then...
Step 2: Inspire alliance-level conflict by.......(The candy to fight over)
Then..
Step 3: Super gates to Elysium!...(MOAR candy to fight over!)
Or was I injecting my own hopes into my read of the dev blog?
F
Would you like to know more? |
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
1462
|
Posted - 2014.10.06 15:49:00 -
[5] - Quote
Remove jump drives entirely, make all the things go through gates. No more crazy jump-fatigue math and timers. Done.
(Except jump freighters, rorquals and perhaps BLOPS..)
F
Would you like to know more? |
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
1463
|
Posted - 2014.10.07 14:04:00 -
[6] - Quote
Chigiku wrote:I really hope this change will come live in november. (the jump fatigue and the reduced ly jump range, for caps / jf)
I personally find it a wonderful idea
I think CCP expected Crius to make so that null sec people would rather produce in null sec than shopping everything in jita, hope it will be attained in Phoebe
Agree. People in this thread seem fixated on the opening move by CCP in this game of fix-null chess...
What if the next moves are things like this. 2 out of 6 done so far...
(fingers crossed)
F
Would you like to know more? |
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Lords.Of.Midnight
The Devil's Warrior Alliance
1469
|
Posted - 2014.10.08 20:22:00 -
[7] - Quote
Dream Five wrote:
If you can achieve the same goal with a simpler formula that's a strictly better solution.
Remove jump drives completely.
(cept' for JF's and Blops...they still get ugly math..) :)
Would you like to know more? |
| |
|